Squamish’s viewscape study journey started with the 2017 Official Community Plan (OCP), where extensive public engagement helped understand community values and needs across the District and Downtown.
As part of the OCP work, a new policy was created to complete a downtown view corridor study to identify important public realm view corridors that should be protected during the development process. For Squamish, the viewscapes desired to be preserve are the natural surrounding landscapes.
Viewscape locations for this study were chosen from the OCP’s– Downtown Open Spaces Plan. All public parks, corner plaza’s and high streets were reviewed as part of the Viewscape Study.
Public engagement on the Downtown Viewscape Study started in July of 2022. Engagement consisted of an online survey, in-person walking tours, and site-specific sessions. Further engagement with Squamish Nation specifically regarding viewscape impacts of Oceanfront Development on St’á7mes Reserve land 24 is being coordinated in partnership with the District of Squamish and Squamish Nation. Squamish Nation’s Language and Culture team have assisted the District immensely in ensuring Squamish Nation names of views are appropriately labeled and spelt correctly. View the full survey results.
Complete A Comprehensive Downtown View Corridor Study to identify important public realm view corridors which should be protected during the development process.
Timeframe | Action |
Spring 2022 | Present to Council Identify key areas on Open Space Map |
Summer 2022 | Public Engagement Community Walks Virtual Survey |
Fall 2022 | Identify Corridors and Viewpoints to include in study. |
Spring 2023 | Hire Consultant to create view corridors and development visuals. |
Fall 2023 | Present Findings & Recommendations |
Spring 2024 | Create Viewscape Guidelines Terms of reference. |
Summer 2024 | Bring Viewscape Guidelines and Terms of Reference as part of larger OCP amendment for Council consideration. |
Winter 2024/2025 | Bring Viewscape Regulation for Council consideration. |
This map highlights where nine locations and 31 views in the study are located. It also highlights the 9 different views from the Downtown considered in the survey and massing exercise. The map also generally highlights what properties were considered in the massing exercise, purple being District of Squamish owned and blue being privately owned. Some views included in the survey were not included in the consultant massing visuals. Rationale:
Click on each view below to learn more about the view, what survey respondents said about the view (quotes and survey results), and see visuals on what extent a view could possibly be protected “Proposed Possible” in comparison to current zoning allowances “Currently Possible”.
Ownership: Private land
Survey responses: How important is this view?
“The charm of Squamish is the views of the surrounding landmarks: if they're not visible from our 'main' street and all you see are buildings and building shade covering the street the experience will be diminished and Squamish will just be another town.”
Proposed Possible | Currently Possible |
Viewscape consideration massing | Current C4 zoning |
3 storeys | 6 storeys |
15m upper storey setback | C4 upper storey setback |
Ownership: Private land
Survey responses: How important is this view?
“Walking. Views have already been compromised here so more important to preserve what is left. Tantalus range is still less important than the Chief and Mt. Garibaldi”
Proposed Possible | Currently Possible |
Viewscape loss | Current C4 zoning |
4 storeys | 6 storeys |
15m upper storey setback | C4 upper storey setback |
Ownership: Private land
Survey responses: How important is this view?
“Our mountain vistas are currently 360 degrees and are an integral part of the Squamish Experience. The downtown area is so congested already; let developers build elsewhere where views aren’t compromised in the daily experience of people.”
Proposed Possible | Currently Possible |
Viewscape consideration massing | Current C4 zoning |
3 & 4 storeys | 6 storeys |
15m upper storey setback | C4 upper storey setback |
Ownership: Private land
Survey responses: How important is this view?
“Stawamus Chief and Tantalus Mountain Range are already compromised from the confines of Cleveland buildings (other than at intersections) so I feel that Mount Garibaldi view preservation is paramount in this instance.”
Proposed Possible | Currently Possible |
Viewscape consideration massing | Current C4 zoning |
3 & 4 storeys | 6 storeys |
15m upper storey setback | C4 upper storey setback |
Ownership: Private land
Survey responses: How important is this view?
“The most prominent intersections of our downtown core, it is important to feel like you are surrounded by nature. Squamish could easily become like any other major city who builds condos on every corner. But the views from downtown set us apart”
Proposed Possible | Currently Possible |
Viewscape consideration massing | Current C4 zoning |
3 & 4 storeys | 6 storeys |
15m upper storey setback | C4 upper storey setback |
Ownership: Private land
Survey responses: How important is this view?
“Squamish is a mountain community and these places are what connects us. If we can't see them then we don't live in the mountains any more. We live in a city, how boring.”
Proposed Possible | Currently Possible |
Viewscape consideration massing | C4 current zoning |
3 & 4 storeys | 6 storeys |
15m upper storey setback | C4 upper storey setback |
Ownership: Private land
Survey responses: How important is this view?
“The views to the east towards Squamish Chief are the most important views in Squamish."
“Downtown should really express the essence of Squamish which is it's incredible views. Once these views have been covered there is no going back.”
Proposed Possible | Currently Possible |
Viewscape consideration massing | C4 current zoning |
3 storeys | 6 storeys |
15m upper storey setback | C4 upper storey setback |
Ownership: Private land
Survey responses: How important is this view?
“Mamquam Mountains are the only glaciers we get to see all season long.”
“I like views that don't have surface parking lots in them....”
Proposed Possible | Currently Possible |
Viewscape loss | C4 current zoning |
3 storeys | 6 storeys |
15m upper storey setback | C4 upper storey setback |
Ownership: Private land
Survey responses: How important is this view?
“I think all views are important to preserve. We are a mountain town. There should have been a 4 storey max bylaw a long time ago.”
Proposed Possible | Currently Possible |
Viewscape consideration massing | C4 current zoning |
4 storeys | 6 storeys |
15m upper storey setback | C4 upper storey setback |
Ownership: Private land
Survey responses: How important is this view?
St’et’e7ímin (Castle Rock)
Mount Murchison
“Downtown is amazing and so are these views. Please keep the views for us and our kids to enjoy.”
Proposed Possible | Currently Possible |
Viewscape consideration massing | C4 current zoning |
4 storeys | 6 storeys |
15m upper storey setback | C4 upper storey setback |
Ownership: Private land
Survey responses: How important is this view?
Mount Murchison:
Naḵwáach (Echo Falls):
Proposed Possible | Currently Possible |
Viewscape consideration massing | C4 current zoning |
4 storeys | 6 storeys |
4m upper storey and Winnipeg setbacks | C4 upper storey setback on Cleveland only |
Ownership: Private land
Survey responses: How important is this view?
"Development in this area is ok, as long as a) building sizes are limited to under 6 stories including parking and retail. And b) condos are built with a natural west coast style."
Proposed Possible | Currently Possible |
Viewscape consideration massing | Current C4 zoning |
4 or 5 storeys | 6 storeys |
Upper storey and building setbacks | No setback |
Ownership: Private land
Survey responses: How important is this view?
Siám Smánit (Stawamus Chief):
Sḵwaháye7en (Slhanay):
“Some of the better views of the Chief, Tantalus and Slhanay are from this vantage point.”
Proposed Possible | Currently Possible |
Viewscape consideration massing | Current C4 zoning |
4 or 5 storeys | 6 storeys |
Upper storey and building setbacks | No setback |
Ownership: Private land
Survey responses: How important is this view?
"Development in this area is ok, as long as a) building sizes are limited to under 6 stories including parking and retail. And b) condos are built with a natural west coast style."
Proposed Possible |
Viewscape consideration massing |
4 storey |
Ownership: District Land
Survey responses: How important is this view?
Siám Smánit (Stawamus Chief):
St’á7mes Bluffs (Stawamus Bluffs):
“This corner is going to be the main hub of downtown. It's where you first start to approach the chief, the pedestrian bridge from the Sea and Sky development, water access, restaurants, etc. It's really important to preserve views of chief and channel”
Proposed Possible | Currently Possible |
Viewscape consideration massing | Current C4 zoning |
2 or 4 storeys | 6 storeys |
Ownership: District Land
Survey responses: How important is this view?
Siám Smánit (Stawamus Chief):
St’á7mes Bluffs (Stawamus Bluffs):
Proposed Possible | Currently Possible |
Viewscape loss of Stawamus Bluffs | Current C4 zoning |
2 storeys | 6 storeys |
No upper storey setbacks | C4 upper storey setback |
Ownership: Private Land
Survey responses: How important is this view?
Proposed Possible | Currently Possible |
Viewscape consideration massing | Current C4 zoning |
2 & 4 storeys | 6 storeys |
15m upper storey setback | C4 upper storey setback |
Ownership: District Land
Survey responses: How important is this view?
Siám Smánit (Stawamus Chief):
Sḵwaháye7en (Slhanay):
“It is the park where most community engagement comes together. I think the mountain views are important here.”
Proposed Possible | Currently Possible |
Viewscape consideration massing | Current C4 zoning |
4 storeys | 6 storeys |
Upper storey setbacks | No setback |
Ownership: District Land
Survey responses: How important is this view?
“I sit in different areas of the park at different time. I think its important that the downtown area does keep some open space where the view is not obstructed by tall buildings of multiple stories, in 360 degrees.”
Proposed Possible | Currently Possible |
Viewscape consideration massing | Current C4 zoning |
4 & 6 storeys | 6 storeys |
Upper storey setbacks | No setback |
Ownership: District Land
Survey responses: How important is this view?
Siám Smánit (Stawamus Chief):
St’á7mes Bluffs (Stawamus Bluffs):
“I use the Pavilion the most. Listening to the music with this 360 view is all what Squamish is about for me”
Proposed Possible | Currently Possible |
Viewscape consideration massing | Current C4 zoning |
3 or 4 storeys | 6 storeys |
Ownership: District Land
Survey responses: How important is this view?
Mount Murchison:
St’et’e7ímin (Castle Rock):
“The park is valuable as an open space with near 360 degree views of our beautiful landscapes around it. Sitting on the grass and enjoying all of our outdoor events without feeling closed in by buildings is extremely important to protect”
Proposed Possible | Currently Possible |
Viewscape loss of Castle Rock | Current C4 zoning |
2, 4 & 6 storeys | 6 storeys |
Ownership: Private Land
Survey responses: How important is this view?
“It's a precious green space and important to keep the area around it as open as possible”
Proposed Possible | Currently Possible |
Viewscape consideration massing | Current C4 Zoning |
3 or 4 storeys | 6 storeys |
Upper storey front setback | C4 upper storey setback |
C
Ownership: Private Land
Survey responses: How important is this view?
“The park is an area to sit, have lunch, enjoy the views. And would be very sad to see it boxed in by condos.”
Proposed Possible | Currently Possible |
Viewscape consideration massing | C4 zoning |
2, 4 & 6 storeys | 6 storeys |
Ownership: Private Land
Survey responses: How important is this view?
“Castle Rock = THE BEST”
Proposed Possible | Currently Possible |
Viewscape loss | C4 zoning |
4 & 6 storeys | 6 storeys |
Ownership: Private Land
Survey responses: How important is this view?
Naḵwáach (Echo Falls):
Mount Murchison:
“Views aren't more important than commercial areas or housing. Views can be accessed from other areas than downtown.”
“I think maintaining the dramatic landscapes are important which does change from each vantage point. I feel from Cleveland East the views of the Tantalus and falls to the West are less prominent and not as big a loss.”
Proposed Possible | Currently Possible |
Viewscape loss of Echo Falls | CD zoning |
6 storeys | 6 storeys |
Upper storey setback on both frontages | C4 upper storey setback |
Ownership: Private Land
Survey responses: How important is this view?
“This is a good area for development. But all efforts should be made to limit building size to avoid squamish’s downtown from becoming too enclosing”
“I feel that this location provides a unique and full view of Slhanay that other locations in this survey don't offer. And obviously, the Chief is another iconic Squamish view that needs to be absolutely preserved.”
Proposed Possible | Currently Possible |
Viewscape consideration massing | C4 zoning |
3 or 4 storeys | 6 storeys |
Ownership: Private Land
Survey responses: How important is this view?
“Please keep our views. Keeping these views is an accessibility factor. Not everyone can venture further to see these views.”
“The views from this intersection are not important to me. Currently this intersection is a terrible place for people and not somewhere that I like to stop and enjoy views.”
Proposed Possible | Currently Possible |
Viewscape consideration massing | C4 zoning |
4 storeys | 6 storeys |
Building and upper storey setback | C4 upper storey setback |
Ownership: Private Land
Survey responses: How important is this view?
St’et’e7ímin (Castle Rock):
Mount Murchison:
“This is a downtown intersection and is an appropriate place to allow for higher buildings. It's downtown. As mentioned before, Castle Rock is pretty cool.”
Proposed Possible | Currently Possible |
Viewscape consideration massing | C4 zoning |
4 storeys | 6 storeys |
4m upper storey setback | C4 upper storey setback |
Ownership: Private Land
Survey responses: How important is this view?
“Being able to see the Smoke Bluffs from here helps us to feel connected to Hospital Hill/Valleycliffe neighbourhood & having nature that close feels soothing. The Mt Garibaldi view feels less important here as it really shines further down Cleveland.”
Proposed Possible | Currently Possible |
Viewscape consideration massing | C4 zoning |
4 storeys | 6 storeys |
Lower and upper setbacks | C4 upper storey setback |
Ownership: Private Land
Survey responses: How important is this view?
“Keeping as many low rise businesses as possible greatly contributes to Squamish’s uniqueness and feel. Instead of condos on every corner of downtown, we need greater density in other areas in place of all of the luxury single family dwellings”
Proposed Possible | Currently Possible |
Viewscape consideration massing | C4 zoning |
2 storeys | 6 storeys |
No upper storey setback | C4 upper storey setback |
Ownership: Private Land
Survey responses: No survey data
Proposed Possible |
Viewscape consideration massing |
3 storeys |